Entelec Open Forum

last person joined: one month ago 

PLEASE JOIN the community to participate! The ENTELEC Open Forum is a community for all who wish to participate with the ENTELEC community at large. This community has a Discussion Group where members of the community can post questions and receive answers from other members as well as post files to the library for general items.

Three Critical Considerations for Enterprises When Procuring MPLS Services

By Jack Richards posted 08-23-2011 12:05

  

Three Critical Considerations for Enterprises When Procuring MPLS Services

 

Picture 16.pngThe broad acceptance of Multi-Protocol Label Switching (“MPLS”) service by enterprise customers warrants a “fresh look” in negotiating three important aspects of Wireline services agreements.  The discussion on service provider transitions applies to Wireless services agreements, as well.

1.  Addressing Chronic Service Issues.  The principal benefits of MPLS service are “any-to-any” connectivity, scalability and ease in adding or deleting sites.  Readily available CPE supports voice-over-MPLS.  These benefits are maximized when MPLS is offered by a single carrier, although multi-national firms may maintain region-specific MPLS networks and some large enterprises maintain several MPLS networks (each provided by a different carrier) for redundancy purposes.

A glaring weakness in carriers’ standard services agreements is the failure to address reasonably the risk of chronic service problems in an MPLS environment.  The carriers’ standard (and antiquated) “partial discontinuance” clauses are limited to problems associated with services to a single customer location; potentially relevant for high volume call centers utilizing inbound toll free services, but not an MPLS network.  Even though Service Level Agreements (“SLAs”), such as mean time to repair and site availability are customer-oriented, the metrics remain largely site-specific.

If  MPLS service to priority customer locations (data centers or corporate offices) are subject to chronic outages, the enterprise’s businesses and processes will be impacted severely and adversely.  The standard carrier insurance policy (to be purchased by the customer) of redundant ports, access and routers is not the answer.  The burden should not be shifted to the customer to insure that the carrier delivers the agreed-upon level of service.  In light of the limitations on potential damages demanded by carriers and the risks associated with chronic service issues, a tailored remedy or escalating remedial responses are warranted to more equitably address the risks borne by MPLS customers. 

To read more from our "Beyond Telecom Law Blog", visit http://www.beyondtelecomlawblog.com/.

0 comments
129 views

Permalink